In the Supreme Court, ANS defends the existence of a collective health plan

messi23

The National Supplementary Health Agency defended in the Federal Supreme Court the existence of benefit administrators which propose the contracting of collective health plans and provide services to contracting companies. According to the ANS these market actors are important to prevent false collectivization which are models of medical insurance that use the collective character of an association for health care with the aim of circumventing the supervision of the regulatory body unlike individual ones.

ADI was moved by the PSL which says there is an Germany Phone Number affront to constitutional precepts in the existence of plan administrators. reproduction The argument was presented in the opinion made by ANS to be included in Direct Unconstitutionality Action filed by the PSL. The party filed an ADI against the so-called "benefits administrators" alleging that the ANS innovated by creating this activity. The acronym also questioned the fact that the regulatory agency does not charge these companies with obligations imposed on health plan operators and does not define which illicit activities must be prevented in this area of ​​activity.



He also said that the possibility of these companies operating violates free enterprise due to the supposed control of adjustments the principle of equality and cooperativism. The ANS counters the accusation by saying that it did not create the figure of so-called benefits administrators but that it merely standardized a niche that already existed without any control. The rules for administrators were defined by Normative Resolution . As the collective plan depends on the intermediation of a legal entity 'facade associations' began to operate on the market which bring together people without any ties with the sole objective of having a plan that at first seems cheaper but which brings as seen several risks to the beneficiary says the ANS in the piece.